‘Watch the Water’ Right on Remdesivir, But Snake Venom Theory Is a Stretch By Madhava Setty, M.D.
In an interview Monday with Stew Peters, Brian Ardis, a doctor of chiropractic, attempted to connect SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein or simply the disease process itself known as COVID-19, to the deadly proteins in snake venom.
In the 30-minute, heavily produced conversation, Ardis did not explicitly state his opinion on whether COVID is caused by a virus or by widely dispersed toxins similar to the poisons in snake bites.
Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, took issue with some of Ardis’ statments.
“We agree there is evidence that the virus is similar to snake venom,” Kirsch wrote on Substack. “But as for the other assertions (such as it’s a poison spread through the water), I’m not buying it.”
In a Substack post, Dr. Meryl Nass also disagreed with Ardis, writing, “Many statements in the Bryan Ardis video are accurate, but some are definitely not.”
Nass, an internist and member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, reminded us that Ardis is correctly pointing out that remdesivir is a dangerous drug that has undoubtedly caused or contributed to many COVID deaths.
As early as November 2020, the World Health Organization recommended against the use of remdesivir, regardless of disease severity, because there was no evidence the drug improved outcomes.
Although the expensive drug was widely reported to be ineffective, its harmful effects were downplayed by mainstream sources.
Nevertheless, remdesivir enjoys unwavering support from our medical authorities and remains the only antiviral remedy available in most hospital formularies for the treatment of COVID.
...it's just so crazy, some of his assertions could be true. where the narrative could be debated til kingdom come and nobody would be any closer to understanding reality, ya know?
It’s an interesting narrative. I watched the Stew Peters episode and haven’t watched the Brighteon episodes yet, so with those caveats, these are my preliminary thoughts:
1. It is good that Bryan is attending the call this Thursday with my colleagues. This is something that people promoting false narratives never agree to.
2. My colleagues who have seen the videos believe some parts (similarity with snake venom), but not others (poison spread through the water).
3. Most of us didn’t like the narrative presentation. It would have been much better to enumerate up front what the novel claims were and then methodically justify each claim with evidence. Instead it was a long mystery novel.
4. My readers are split on whether Dr Ardis is credible as you’ll see from the comments below.
5. Everyone agrees he’s making some observations that are worthy of discussion.
6. I was amazed at the fortune cookie story at the end of the Stew Peters interview. That just seems too hard to believe. But I don’t think Bryan would lie about it either. That part was really hard to believe, but apparently true.
7. He mispronounced Genentech and was unfamiliar with them. Odd.
8. The Bing Liu murder is real. I’m not buying the lover’s quarrel story promoted by the police because nobody knew he had a girlfriend. More on this in another substack.
If I had heard this video a year ago, I would have totally dismissed it. But the most important lesson of the pandemic is to not be so fast as to dismiss things that don’t fit your narrative.
Do I think Dr. Ardis has “solved” it and all the pieces fit together? No, but I’m willing and open to being convinced.
4 comments:
This video has generated quite a bit of discussion. Here's one article about it:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/watch-the-water-remdesivir-snake-venom-theory/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=ee69c458-1145-4f6e-8268-3d85d06b4c35
‘Watch the Water’ Right on Remdesivir, But Snake Venom Theory Is a Stretch
By Madhava Setty, M.D.
In an interview Monday with Stew Peters, Brian Ardis, a doctor of chiropractic, attempted to connect SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein or simply the disease process itself known as COVID-19, to the deadly proteins in snake venom.
In the 30-minute, heavily produced conversation, Ardis did not explicitly state his opinion on whether COVID is caused by a virus or by widely dispersed toxins similar to the poisons in snake bites.
Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, took issue with some of Ardis’ statments.
“We agree there is evidence that the virus is similar to snake venom,” Kirsch wrote on Substack. “But as for the other assertions (such as it’s a poison spread through the water), I’m not buying it.”
In a Substack post, Dr. Meryl Nass also disagreed with Ardis, writing, “Many statements in the Bryan Ardis video are accurate, but some are definitely not.”
Nass, an internist and member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, reminded us that Ardis is correctly pointing out that remdesivir is a dangerous drug that has undoubtedly caused or contributed to many COVID deaths.
As early as November 2020, the World Health Organization recommended against the use of remdesivir, regardless of disease severity, because there was no evidence the drug improved outcomes.
Although the expensive drug was widely reported to be ineffective, its harmful effects were downplayed by mainstream sources.
Nevertheless, remdesivir enjoys unwavering support from our medical authorities and remains the only antiviral remedy available in most hospital formularies for the treatment of COVID.
[...]
...it's just so crazy, some of his assertions could be true. where the narrative could be debated til kingdom come and nobody would be any closer to understanding reality, ya know?
Steve Kirsch's reaction:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/what-i-think-of-the-bryan-ardis-video?s=r
[...]
It’s an interesting narrative. I watched the Stew Peters episode and haven’t watched the Brighteon episodes yet, so with those caveats, these are my preliminary thoughts:
1. It is good that Bryan is attending the call this Thursday with my colleagues. This is something that people promoting false narratives never agree to.
2. My colleagues who have seen the videos believe some parts (similarity with snake venom), but not others (poison spread through the water).
3. Most of us didn’t like the narrative presentation. It would have been much better to enumerate up front what the novel claims were and then methodically justify each claim with evidence. Instead it was a long mystery novel.
4. My readers are split on whether Dr Ardis is credible as you’ll see from the comments below.
5. Everyone agrees he’s making some observations that are worthy of discussion.
6. I was amazed at the fortune cookie story at the end of the Stew Peters interview. That just seems too hard to believe. But I don’t think Bryan would lie about it either. That part was really hard to believe, but apparently true.
7. He mispronounced Genentech and was unfamiliar with them. Odd.
8. The Bing Liu murder is real. I’m not buying the lover’s quarrel story promoted by the police because nobody knew he had a girlfriend. More on this in another substack.
If I had heard this video a year ago, I would have totally dismissed it. But the most important lesson of the pandemic is to not be so fast as to dismiss things that don’t fit your narrative.
Do I think Dr. Ardis has “solved” it and all the pieces fit together? No, but I’m willing and open to being convinced.
[...]
thank you SO MUCH Linh, i really appreciate you Sir
Post a Comment