Anonymous...you have been fooled like everyone else. A photo does not prove the existence of a virus. Do you even know what the definition of a virus is? Here it is:
Any of a large group of submicroscopic infectious agents that are usually regarded as nonliving extremely complex molecules, that typically contain a protein coat surrounding an RNA or DNA core of genetic material but no semipermeable membrane, that are capable of growth and multiplication only in living cells, and that cause various important diseases in humans, animals, and plants.
If you can even read, pay attention to the part which reads, "that are capable of growth and multiplication only in living cells, and that cause various important diseases in humans, animals, and plants".
A bloody picture does not prove this. I suggest you take off your rose colored glasses and watch Dr. Sam's video above.
The real question is, do you have the courage because you will realize your entire foundation of truth is a lie. Courage is key.
Hey Ron, which part of the definition of a virus do you think is wrong? How do you think a collection of inert particles (virus capsid plus DNA or RNA package) could survive and multiply if not by replicating in the cells of a living host? And, by the way, people have been amplifying viruses in the lab (increasing their numbers) by this same mechanism every day for at least 70 years. It's simple, you could do it in your garage these days and even estimate the increase in the # of virus particles.
8 comments:
No such thing as a VIRUS people. If your are ignorant, you are easily manipulated and lied to which is to your own disadvantage:
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a
https://nobelprizemuseum.se/en/viruses-captured-in-photos/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC347001/pdf/pnas00458-0068.pdf
For the shape of the earth, see Eretosthenes (~200 BC) :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes
Anonymous...you have been fooled like everyone else. A photo does not prove the existence of a virus. Do you even know what the definition of a virus is? Here it is:
Any of a large group of submicroscopic infectious agents that are usually regarded as nonliving extremely complex molecules, that typically contain a protein coat surrounding an RNA or DNA core of genetic material but no semipermeable membrane, that are capable of growth and multiplication only in living cells, and that cause various important diseases in humans, animals, and plants.
If you can even read, pay attention to the part which reads, "that are capable of growth and multiplication only in living cells, and that cause various important diseases in humans, animals, and plants".
A bloody picture does not prove this. I suggest you take off your rose colored glasses and watch Dr. Sam's video above.
The real question is, do you have the courage because you will realize your entire foundation of truth is a lie. Courage is key.
The power of propaganda and brainwashing: Thais are 99.9% masked, as seen in Bangkok, even if Covid is yesterday's bs.
Not quite 99.9%. 80% at most. I see many people unmasked.--Linh
At least in the center of Bangkok. I don't know about the provinces.
Hey Ron, which part of the definition of a virus do you think is wrong? How do you think a collection of inert particles (virus capsid plus DNA or RNA package) could survive and multiply if not by replicating in the cells of a living host? And, by the way, people have been amplifying viruses in the lab (increasing their numbers) by this same mechanism every day for at least 70 years. It's simple, you could do it in your garage these days and even estimate the increase in the # of virus particles.
PS.
https://globalnews.ca/news/9305181/50000-year-old-zombie-virus-revived-siberia-permafrost
Post a Comment